From the BlogSubscribe Now

Aperture vs Lightroom: The Aperture X Rumor

At the end of Decem­ber, 2012, the tech blogs had fun with a rumor of Aper­ture X — a new update to Aper­ture with an early 2013 release date.

The basis for all of this spec­u­la­tion came from a forth­com­ing book title spot­ted on Amazon.com.

Aperture vs Lightroom

It’s a good time for these rumors. The last major release of Aper­ture came out in early 2010, so it’s easy to spec­u­late that the next major release will also come out early in the year. In rumor the­ory, that’s per­fectly logical.

Even the name itself came under scrutiny. Instead of Aper­ture 4, this new ver­sion called Aper­ture X gave hope to a com­plete rewrite and changed to the Aper­ture that we know. Since the last release of Final Cut Pro was also titled as ver­sion X, this must be plau­si­ble proof that the same changes are com­ing to Aper­ture. Never mind that Final Cut Pro and Aper­ture serve dif­fer­ent mar­kets and needs.

Some Inter­net Mar­keter — hop­ing to cash-in on the new ver­sion — even reg­is­tered ApertureX.net and is try­ing to sell it. I hope he appre­ci­ates the back link, but I wouldn’t rec­om­mend pay­ing for that domain.

The Prob­lem with the Aper­ture X Rumor

While all of these lit­tle clues may be tit­il­lat­ing to rumor mon­gers and the eas­ily excited, there’s not much of a rea­son to get excited. You see, we’ve seen this rumor before.  Accord­ing to a post on MacRumors.com from Octo­ber 27, 2009, Aper­ture X was sched­uled for launch before the end of that year. Aper­ture 3 — not Aper­ture x — was released on Feb­ru­ary 9, 2010.

All this Ama­zon list­ing means is that a cou­ple of book authors are spec­u­lat­ing that a new ver­sion of Aper­ture is due and they’re writ­ing a book for it. Are they under NDA with Apple? Doubt­ful. Apple’s secu­rity and secrecy about forth­com­ing prod­ucts is noto­ri­ous in the tech indus­try. The authors are prob­a­bly writ­ing the book based upon the cur­rent ver­sion. When the new ver­sion ships, they’ll do a mad dash to update the book with any new fea­tures of the next release.

Why not just wait until the next ver­sion ships before start­ing to write about it? Because peo­ple want books when a prod­uct launches. Because their com­pe­ti­tion is doing exactly the same thing. They know that much of the new ver­sion will work exactly like the old ver­sion. In order to cash-in on the prod­uct launch, they need to be as close to ready as pos­si­ble to release a book when the next ver­sion of Aper­ture hits the market.

What about the title? How do they know it’s Aper­ture X, not Aper­ture 4? They don’t know.  Just as with the rumor from 2009, the “X” is noth­ing more than a place­holder in the title. Like the con­tents of the book, it’ll get updated when Apple announces the product.

Isn’t Aper­ture Sup­posed to be Dead?

Apple upgraded Aper­ture nine times in 2012 - rang­ing from ver­sion 3.2.2 at the start of the year to the cur­rent 3.4.3 ver­sion. Despite pro­vid­ing so many free updates with some use­ful fea­tures, a num­ber of folks declared that Apple aban­doned Aper­ture and it was time for them to do the same.

How utterly stupid.

I have no idea what kind of logic deter­mines that a prod­uct with nine updates in a year has been aban­doned by its devel­oper. Yet, since there wasn’t a major ver­sion release, they con­vinced them­selves that Aper­ture was doomed and it was time to make the switch to Light­room.

Both pro­grams do a fan­tas­tic job. As I’ve detailed on this blog, each has some strengths and weak­nesses com­pared to the other. My advice to those who are think­ing about switch­ing is to pay atten­tion to those details. Switch­ing from one dig­i­tal asset man­ager to another is a big deal. Unless you find some­thing in one pro­gram that you des­per­ately need and it’s lack­ing in your cur­rent soft­ware — don’t switch! It’s just not worth the cost and effort. Since your edits in Aper­ture and Light­room don’t affect the actual file, you’re going to lose a lot of your work when you make the switch.

Aper­ture vs Light­room: Conclusion

I have no inside knowl­edge about the next ver­sion of Aper­ture. You can try to read the tea leaves and divine your own con­clu­sion. For some, that means aban­don­ing ship from a prod­uct that works well and is see­ing con­stant updates — free updates. My own spec­u­la­tion is that Aper­ture is due for a major revi­sion this year. I spec­u­lated the same thing last year. In the mean time, my cur­rent ver­sion of Aper­ture con­tin­ues hap­pily working.

The best advice I can give you is to avoid get­ting your shorts in a knot about an upgrade.  If you aren’t being served by your dig­i­tal asset man­ager today and some­thing else will resolve your prob­lem, switch. Oth­er­wise, for­get about it and be pleas­antly sur­prised when some­thing new comes along.

DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail
  • http://twitter.com/InMyGarden1 In My Garden

    I cer­tainly hope this rumor finally comes true as I’m about to jump ship from Aper­ture to Light­room (even though I much pre­fer the Aper­ture workflow!)

    • http://www.orlandolocal.com William Beem

      OK, help me under­stand. If you pre­fer Aper­ture’s work­flow, why would you want to move to Light­room? The answer I often here is because folks say Aper­ture hasn’t been updated, but there were 9 updates last year at no cost. So what’s the moti­va­tion to move away from the prod­uct with the work­flow you prefer?

      • http://twitter.com/InMyGarden1 In My Garden

        I’ve had a recent issue with Aper­ture that is dri­ving me a lit­tle crazy. Some pho­tos that I’ve already edited, revert to orig­i­nal when I click on them (or just appear to). When using the quick pre­view it shows with edits, reg. pre­view (with the film­strip in the bot­tom) the film­strip shows edited, the top larger photo shows orig­i­nal. Oh, and in some fold­ers it’s the reverse, orig­i­nal in film­strip and edited in top pre­view. And it’s only hap­pen­ing with some pho­tos, not all. I’m afraid to click on any of my pho­tos any­more. Aper­ture help has been no help at all, nei­ther have any of the forums I’ve posted in. I’m not sure if this is just some buggy thing? I did down­load a trial of light­room just to try it out, and found it not nearly as intu­itive as Aper­ture, but I did like some of the presets.

        • http://www.orlandolocal.com William Beem

          That’s gotta be annoy­ing. Can’t say that I’ve ever run across an issue like that one before. My first instinct is that it’s due to an index error — Aper­ture point­ing to the wrong image for the preview/display. Have you tried rebuild­ing your library to see if it helped?

          • http://twitter.com/InMyGarden1 In My Garden

            I’ve been reluc­tant for fear (prob­a­bly irra­tional) of hav­ing every­thing revert to orig­i­nal if I rebuild the library. Cer­tainly the most frus­trat­ing part is not being able to find help or any­one else who’s had the same problem!

          • http://www.orlandolocal.com William Beem

            Well, just make a copy of your Aper­ture library so you can restore it if you don’t like the results. If it all goes bad, you can at least save your cur­rent state.

        • http://www.facebook.com/ChrisPerello Chris Perello

          Don’t switch, you will regret it.

    • http://www.facebook.com/ChrisPerello Chris Perello

      I can tell you, from some­one who has used noth­ing but light­room for years and just switched to Aper­ture, stay. Aper­ture is way bet­ter in my opin­ion. You will end up com­ing back to Aper­ture, trust me.

  • L Delorme Artis­tic Photography

    I’ve been con­sid­er­ing switch­ing to Light­room, not because I have any prob­lem with Aper­ture, but because I can get much supe­rior hard­ware in the win­dows world. Dell Pre­ci­sion with RGB LED dis­play cov­ers full AdobeRGB gamut, Mac­Book Pro doesn’t. The Asus Zen­books 11.6″ have IPS dis­plays, Mac­Book Air lags behind. And the Mac Pros are so far behind it’s not funny.

    I just have a really hard time try­ing to go back to Win­dows after so many years on Mac. I just wish I didn’t have to choose between the best soft­ware and the best hard­ware. I really want both :)

    • http://www.orlandolocal.com William Beem

      I com­pletely under­stand that con­cept. In my case, it’s the other way around. I ditched Microsoft at home back in the days of Win­dows XP SP2 because it was a night­mare to get any decent con­fig­u­ra­tion or performance.

      Yet in my day job, I’m run­ning Win­dows all the time. My cur­rent Win­dows machine for the office is a Mac­book Pro 13″ with Retina dis­play. Runs like a dream, though I wish the SSD was a tad larger. I was con­sid­er­ing the Asus Zen­book, but time was crit­i­cal when I bought and I knew I could walk into an Apple Store and get a decent machine. It’s hard to do that with many Win­dows com­put­ers because retail stores stock low-end con­sumer models.

      The really cool thing about Light­room is that you can make the switch from Mac to Win­dows with­out impact­ing your data. Switch­ing from Aper­ture to Light­room is going to give you some con­ster­na­tion, but I think you have a com­pelling rea­son for going through that effort.

    • http://www.facebook.com/ChrisPerello Chris Perello

      Mac­book Pro Retina is not behind. Get one and your issues will be gone.

  • Jim

    Updates that fix bugs, crashes, add RAW sup­port to new cam­eras ect don’t improve func­tion­al­ity, fea­tures or edit­ing strengths. I like the work­flow in Aper­ture but be real, Light­room has better/stronger image edit­ing. The cor­rec­tions to light­ing, image noise and sim­ple things like auto-fix in shad­owy areas, high­lights ect are supe­rior to Aper­ture. This is what every­body is clam­or­ing for. In 3 years Apple hasn’t addressed any of this.

    • http://www.orlandolocal.com William Beem

      Actu­ally, sev­eral of the free updates have added or improved func­tion­al­ity in Aper­ture. I would agree that some fea­tures in Light­room are supe­rior to Aper­ture. I’d also agree that some fea­tures in Aper­ture are supe­rior to Light­room. For exam­ple, using skin tone to set White Bal­ance is some­thing you can do in Aper­ture, but it’s lack­ing in Lightroom.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ChrisPerello Chris Perello

    I switched from light­room 4 to aper­ture 3. I wanted to give aper­ture a fair shot and I have to say that I am more than pleased with my find­ings. My images are com­ing out so much bet­ter with aper­ture than I ever thought pos­si­ble. Yes it was a big tran­si­tion with the change in inter­face, but that will hap­pen when you are switch­ing to any dif­fer­ent piece of soft­ware. Light­room is a won­der­ful tool but for me, I think I am going to stick with aper­ture. If there is some­thing that can­not be accom­plished in Aper­ture, there is NIK soft­ware that I can jump into as well as pho­to­shop. Every­one to their own. I switched to aper­ture and I am here to stay.